Defence
forces have always been an attraction as a career option. Apart from the lure
of wearing the uniform, it is the pride and faith of the Nation that makes it
so. In the 60s, the master guides and magazines, then available,
always had a suggested question wherein the candidate would be asked, why the
Forces and not the Police, the winning answer invariably was the pride of
joining the Forces to fight for the country, leaving policing to lesser
mortals.
Let’s
see, how those who join the Army progress in their career (Situation in the
Navy and Air Force would be more or less similar). Here are some statistics that are useful. NDA
is without doubt the premier institution for training of those desirous of
making it as officers in the three services. Entrance exams for NDA are
conducted by the UPSC where candidates in huge numbers apply. In 2020 for
example, for a Course with a capacity of 300, around 5.3 lakhs applied out of
which 2.4 lakhs appeared for the exam. The figures are staggering. No wonder
then that entry into the NDA is considered as one of the most competitive.
After such a competitive exam and selection, one would expect that the
career progression would be smooth over the years with experience gained while
serving in various areas of the country like the other All India Services. But is it so?
The Army structure can be best compared to a
pyramid with a huge base. Lieutenants, captains, majors and lieutenant colonels, who constitute almost 85
per cent of the officer cadre, are at the base, promotions to these ranks are
generally assured based on years of service.
Selections to higher ranks in the 15th or 16th
year, kick in from colonel level which is the first select rank. Unfortunately,
50 to 60 percent officers miss the chance to be promoted at the very first step
of the selection ladder mainly due to lack of vacancies, not capability and
relative merit. Selection to higher ranks is even tougher as the rate of
missing out continues.
So
what makes one eligible and not another?
Selections
are made through selection boards, some call them rejection boards. The inputs to these Boards are performance on courses, honours and awards, disciplinary record and last but
the most important, with about 90 percentage
weightage is the Annual Confidential Report in which the officers performance
and potential for higher ranks is assessed by his superiors up the chain. Every year or more often, the
reporting officers award single digit figurative assessment for various
attributes of the officer being reported upon, with a highest of 9. These
gradings in numbers are awarded for a plethora of attributes some seemingly mundane,
others vital. Figurative assessments are based
on individual reporting officers who all have their own perceptions on what an
officer has demonstrated or has the potential to. Many factors come into play
in this, as every assessing officer too has his likes and dislikes, favourites,
loyalties and the like. While some are known to be very liberal, some realistic,
some are stingy. For example, a
very good and capable officer may be rated favourably by a reporting officer while another
officer with similar qualifications and attributes may not be awarded similarly
by a stingy reporting officer.
With
promotions being vacancy and relative merit based in a batch, its all in the numbers that
the officer gets in his ACRs. If reports are to be believed, some aren’t
approved since their merit is often decided in the second decimal place amongst their
batch. Even in cases where all things like courses, postings, tenures etc being
equal in an officers profile and record of service, it all boils down to what’s
the lucky number that your boss fancies. A lower grading specially in critical
years will mar any chances of promotion to higher rank(s) for ever, once
awarded its rather difficult to get it set aside.
And
why is rank that important? In the Armed Forces, pay and allowances, perks and
authority are naturally related to the rank and position held. Unlike the civvy
street of the Govt, there’s no NFU or auto upgradation of pay/status with a batch. While the
Armed Forces personnel are allowed to carry their ranks by the Constitution
even after they retire from active service, while in service or even after
retirement, allotment of guest rooms, seating arrangements, entitlement of
facilities like canteen institutes etc are all governed by the all-important
rank. And for that the boss’s favourite
number must tally with your lucky number (9 or as close to it as possible)
else, its goodbye to higher ranks even if one is capable.
15 comments:
Hi Deepak...
Well written. Makes interesting reading!
Paul Abraham.
Well articulated, Deepak.
Great. Well written
Deepak, very well articulated and in simple language, anyone can get the gist immediately,I have some comments but that shall be shared with you separately.
Thanks
Thanks
Thanks
Well written. The system is fair, but the implementation maybe flawed, as we humans are not perfect, I feel.
Thanks J P
Very lucidly explained, sir!👍
Well written Deepak.., to the point as it is as actuals more or less.
But the system is not very fair to a large percentage of professional soldiers ( officers) because of the so called structural issues.
In the IAF, once upon a time there was a proposal to have two types of cadre officers once the selection grade kicked in. One to have a cadre of professional officers, especially highly qualified pilots, who do not get cleared for the next higher ranks. Recommendation was to enhance their pay structures similar to NFU till age of superannuation.
Obviously it was shot down by bureaucracy.
The second was to have a cadre of career officers who keep going up the ladder till they reached their level of incompetency in the lucky numbers game, and thereafter followed the other stream with parallel pay structures. Both shot down.
Well written Deepak, the writer in you has made this subject interesting and readable, even though it's mundane
Thanks Unknown, your identity remains a mystery though
Yes, the lucky number is the catch. Unfortunately, more often than not, the assessor is influenced by many non- professional aspects leading to a flawed "lucky number". The article is well written and provides good food for thought.!
Thank you
Post a Comment